A response to Nicholas J. Healy III (PDF, 2013), who defends de Lubac, by Don G. Boland, who offers a critique of Healy and, indirectly, of de Lubac.
See also Don Boland's other essays, along with those of others associated with The Centre for Thomistic Studies, Inc., Sydney, Australia, in this Index of Universitas articles.
[Hat tip to C.B.]
I clicked on your first link and it tried to recruit me to google mail. I suspect this is not what you intended.
ReplyDelete